DEVELOPMENT SERVICES COMMITTEE

That the minutes of the Development Services Committee meeting, Part B, held December 13, 2010, be confirmed.

That the minutes of the Development Services Public Meeting, held December 13, 2010, be confirmed.

That the minutes of the Heritage Markham Committee meeting held December 8, 2010, be received for information purposes.

1) That the report entitled “Acceptance for Maintenance of Plans of Subdivision” Registered Plan Numbers 65R-23852 Parts 6, 7, 8, 9, 14, 15, 21 and 22, 65R-23901 Part 6, 65R-27985 Parts 2, 3, 4, 17, 21, 24 and 29, 65M-3975, 65R-27692 Part 7,65M-3642, 65M-3875, 65M-3998, 65M-3761, 65M-4040, 65M-3960, 65M-3789, 65M-3713, 65M-3780, 65M-3719, 65R-25680 Part 1, 65R-26254 Part 1, 65R-26537 Parts 1 to 10, and 65R-26540 Parts 1, 2, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 & 11, dated January 18, 2011 be received; and, 2) That the municipal services in Subdivision Registered Plan numbers 65R-23852 Parts 6, 7, 8, 9, 14, 15, 21 and 22, 65R-23901 Part 6, 65R-27985 Parts 2, 3, 4, 17, 21, 24 and 29, 65M-3975, 65M-3642, 65M-3875, 65R-27692 Part7, 65M-3998, 65M-3761, 65M-4040, 65M-3960, 65M-3789, 65M-3713, 65M-3780, 65M-3719, 65R-25680 Part 1, 65R-26254 Part 1, 65R-26537 Parts 1 to 10, and 65R-26540 Parts 1, 2, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 & 11, be accepted for Maintenance; and, 3) That by-laws be enacted by Council to accept these subdivisions and to establish each of the roads within the residential subdivisions as a public highway of the Town of Markham; and, 4) That the Community Services Commission accepts the responsibility for operating and maintaining the infrastructure within the subdivision as part of the Town’s system; and, 5) That the Acceptance for Maintenance Period commence October 1, 2010; and, 6) That acceptance of the subdivision be taken into consideration in future operating budgets; and, 7) That the by-l

1) That Development Services Committee receive the updated street name reserve list for the fourth quarter of 2010, attached as Appendix ‘A’ to the January 18 th , 2011 staff report.

1) That the report entitled “Variance to Fence By-Law 277-97 at 9 Walsingham Court” to Development Services Committee, dated January 4, 2011 be received; and, 2) That the request to grant relief from the provisions of the Fence By-Law 277-97 to permit a 1.8m (6ft.) high fence in the front yard and exterior flankage yard be approved subject to the conditions outlined below; and, 3) That the proposed fence be constructed to comply with the following design requirements: (i) The fence shall be positioned adjacent to the property line in order to be screened by the existing vegetation on the site. (Without impacting this vegetation). (ii) The entry gate shall not exceed 1.8m (6ft.) in height. (iii) The design shall conform to the design attached to Appendix A of this report; and further, 4) That Staff be authorized and directed to do all things necessary to give effect to this resolution.

1) That as recommended by Heritage Markham, the Joshua Miller House – 10 Heritage Corners Lane be approved for designation under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act as a property of cultural heritage value or interest; and, 2) That the Clerk’s Department be authorized to publish and serve Council’s Notice of Intention to Designate as per the requirements of the Ontario Heritage Act ; and, 3) That if there are no objections to the designation in accordance with the provisions of the Ontario Heritage Act , the Clerk be authorized to place a designation by-law before Council for adoption; and, 4) That if there are any objections in accordance with the provisions of the Ontario Heritage Act , the Clerk be directed to refer the proposed designation to the Ontario Conservation Review Board; and further, 5) That Staff be authorized and directed to do all things necessary to give effect to this resolution.

1) That Council has no objection to the demolition of the dwelling at 352 Main Street North located within the Markham Village Heritage Conservation District subject to the following conditions: a. The applicant to advertise in the local newspapers the availability of the dwelling for relocation (but not to Markham Heritage Estates) and/or salvage of materials to promote diversion of materials from landfill; b. The applicant obtain Site Plan Approval for a new building which complies with the Markham Village Heritage Conservation District Plan prior to the issuance of a demolition permit; and, 2) That the applicant be notified of Council’s decision as per the requirements of the Ontario Heritage Act; and, 3) That this item be sent to Council on January 25, 2011; and further, 4) That Staff be authorized and directed to do all things necessary to give effect to this resolution.

1) That the January 18, 2011 report entitled “Servicing Allocation Update” be received; and, 2) That Council redistribute “existing” allocation as noted in Table 1; and, 3) That Council endorse the following Regional conditions for distribution of the 2013 servicing allocation: A. In partnership with the Region, agree to determine what constitutes adequate funding and resources to support the reduction of inflow and infiltration (I/I) into wastewater systems with the objective of generating I/I reduction within existing local and Regional systems by: a. Actively participating in a Regional I/I Task Force b. Continuing to seek out the sources of I/I c. Adopting standards and guidelines intended to reduce I/I in new developments and within existing systems, and d. Developing funding and cost sharing principles to address future remediation projects; B. Continue to support Regional water efficiency plans and policies; C. Endorse and promote participation in both the Sustainable Development Through LEED program for high density residential development and Sustainable Homes Incentive Program (SHIP) for ground related residential development; and, 4) That Council distribute 2013 conditional servicing allocation as noted in Table 2 and shown in detail in Attachment “A” to this report; and, 5) That Council endorse the conditions for the distribution of 2013 conditional allocation as identified in Table 4; and, 6) That Council authorize the exchange of “existing” high density allocati